Our purpose
AIViewer is the English learning-and-verification publication from UrduAI. We turn selected creator ideas and important AI developments into living lessons: what the source says, what primary evidence supports, what has changed, and what the reader can try. We publish selectively, not simply because a query is popular.
What earns publication
Every substantial page must remain useful if its embedded video or external source preview is removed. It should do several of the following:
- explain a consequential AI development in plain language;
- help a reader complete a real task more effectively;
- place a creator’s explanation in a wider, source-checked context;
- combine verified sources with meaningful editorial analysis; or
- publish original testing, reporting, data, or field experience.
A page does not meet our standard if it only repeats a provider's claims, lightly rewrites another source, or fills a template without enough original value.
Accuracy and sourcing
- Specific facts, dates, prices, product capabilities, statistics, and quotations should be checked against current, identifiable sources.
- We prefer primary sources such as official documentation, product pages, public filings, research papers, and direct testing.
- We distinguish verified facts from our analysis, estimates, and opinion.
- If a fact cannot be verified reliably, we qualify it, identify the uncertainty, or leave it out.
- External material must be attributed. We do not publish copied or superficially rewritten work as our own.
Authorship and production identity
New pages identify AIViewer as the publisher and show how AI was used. AIViewer does not imply a staffed human newsroom or routine human fact-check when neither exists. The founder sets editorial direction and owns the publication; the AI editorial system can perform page-by-page research, drafting, source checking, implementation, and maintenance. A named human contribution or review is credited only when it occurred.
Evidence and recommendations
A recommendation must be clear about the evidence behind it. Direct testing, documentation research, a creator demonstration, and structured reference data are not interchangeable. Ratings and “best” claims are withheld unless a reproducible test record supports them. Our full process is described in the Evidence Method.
Commercial independence
Advertising, affiliate commissions, sponsorships, free access, or a relationship with a product owner must not determine our conclusions or rating. Material commercial relationships are disclosed. Sponsored work is labeled, and payment does not purchase a positive review. See our Advertising and Affiliate Disclosure and Ownership and Funding page.
AI and automation
AI tools are central to research organization, source review, drafting, editing, structured data, visuals, code, and maintenance. Each new page declares its AI-use mode and evidence limitations. Our operating model and boundaries are explained in the AI Use Policy.
Updates and corrections
AI products change quickly. We show update or verification dates where freshness is important and revise material inaccuracies when we find them. Substantive corrections are explained on the affected page when context would help readers understand what changed. See our Corrections Policy.
Sensitive and high-stakes topics
Content about health, mental health, law, safety, employment, education, or personal finance receives additional scrutiny. We avoid presenting general AI information as individualized professional advice and direct readers to qualified professionals when a decision requires one.
Legacy content
This standard applies to pages published or materially updated on or after July 25, 2026. Older directory, comparison, and template content is being consolidated or removed from the public index. A legacy page without a current test record is not evidence of hands-on testing.
External standards we consult
Our internal rules are informed by Google's guidance on helpful, reliable, people-first content and high-quality reviews. These references do not replace our responsibility to apply editorial judgment.
Questions or concerns
Contact hi@aiviewer.ai with a sourcing question, conflict concern, or suspected breach of these standards.